Leave them well alone. Use an oversized barge pole if needs be, or whatever you have at hand: pike, halberd, partisan, pitchfork. They're not interested in your 'rights' in any sense of the word, either legal or social. They only want to be seen that way, to convince you that they are something that they're not: a threat to your manhood.
From commentor Rivelino:
>>> 'just like i can’t support susan walsh cause she’s the worst kind of threat to betas trying to become real men — she *pretends* to be “for alpha” but is really just for “better beta”. <<<
Take this hypothetical situation for instance:
[Me] "So, you say that you're a proponent of MRA's."
[An eager fresh faced filly] "Yes! I've got lots of evidence to prove it."
"Yes, yes." [She rummages through a large handbag and pulls out a small button badge]. "Look.. I've got a badge from a Pro-Man march."
[She rummages around some more and pulls out a book] "And here's one of Warren Farrells books."
"And look.. look.. here's a leaflet for a Fathers for Justive march."
"And I've been writing pro-male dating on my blog 'The Sleeping Princess."
"The Sleeping Princess.."
"And.. and.. I'm a regular commentor on Roissys blog and Vox Days blog."
"Are you now.."
"Who really really like me."
[In a drole tone] "Really.."
"Oh.. Oh.. Why won't you believe that I like real men. I do. I really really do!"
[Looks at her scepitally]
"Oh, but why wont you believe me?!" [She says with her eyes twinkling and grinning widely]
And so it goes, on and on and on, forever they try to convince you that they are something that they're not. They want to ingratiate themselves to you, to make it seem like they are an ally and not an enemy. It's the same with female MRAs: in her desperation to prove how much she is in favour of real men, she thus demonstrates how much she wants to be 'seen' to be in favour of men. Either seen by you or seen by others. Her displays of pro-men badges, her list of pro-men blogs, her awareness of the injustice system, the books, name dropping Thomas Ball or Matt O'Connor etc etc, and all of these are totally and utterly ostentatious. She has no genuine interest in them at all. She has no interest in you, or men, or injustices against men. They are designed to fool you, to convince you that she is something that she's not. To convince you that she isn't a hostile posing as a friend. Be ware these women, to believe they are genuinely in favour of you remaining, or becoming more manly is a hazard to your mental well being as a man.
In truth, as Rivelino typed, they just want to mould men (that means you) in the shape that they want, depending on the 'mood' they're in. They want you domesticated, beta-sized, emasculated, an emotional wreck, tame, emotionally insecure etc, so that when they want to dress you up, like a toy doll, in whatever mental and physical costume 'they' want you to be in, then they can do so. Susan Walsh wants that: a tame duck that she can dress up in biker leathers and take off to her soirees and parade around like some butch mannequin. Remember, women don't care about anything you want, their only concern is themselves and their ego/vanity, and that includes those who publicly and ostentatiously 'proclaim' to be in favour of 'real men'.